MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318580199 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0383

P253 Histological Remission and Activity as Predictor of Relapse, Hospitalization, and Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2023· article· en· W4318580199 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Shehab, Sarmad Akram, Amal Hassan, Fatema Alrashed, Talat Bessissow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineRelative riskMeta-analysisConfidence intervalRandomized controlled trialHistologyGastroenterologyClinical trialSurgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Treatment targets in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have evolved over the last two decades. The significance of histological remission as a treatment target in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is not well established. The aim of this study is to assess risk of clinical relapse, hospitalizations and need for surgery in patients who achieved histological remission compared to patients with active histology in UC. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and conference abstracts were searched from inception to October 2022. Inclusion criteria included any randomized controlled trial or observational study that included adult patients with UC who achieved histological remission. The primary outcome was the risk of clinical relapse, hospitalization and need for surgery in patients with UC who achieved histological remission compared to patients with active histology. The outcomes were collected and stratified by 2 time points, 6-12 months and 13 or more months. Random effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Results In total 28 studies were included in this meta-analysis. At 6-12 months, the risk of clinical relapse was higher in patients with active histology compared to patients who achieved histological remission (RR= 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69-3.44, p<0.01). There was no difference in risk of hospitalization in patients with histological remission compared to patients with active histology (RR= 4.22, 95% CI 0.91- 19.62, p=0.07). At 13 months or more, the risk of clinical relapse was higher in patients with active histology compared to patients who achieved histological remission (RR= 2.07, 95% CI 1.55-2.76, p<0.01). Risk of hospitalization and need for surgery was also higher in patients with active histology compared to patients who achieved histological remission; (RR= 2.52, 95% CI 1.59-4.00, p<0.01) and (RR= 3.14, 95% CI 1.53-6.45, p<0.01) respectively. Conclusion Histological remission in ulcerative colitis represents a treatment target that is not yet routinely sought in practice. Our study suggests that patients who achieve histological remission have better outcomes in UC than those with active histology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.037
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207