MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318580232 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0714

P584 Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AMT-101, a gut selective oral IL-10 fusion, in the Phase 2 FILLMORE trial of patients with chronic pouchitis

2023· article· en· W4318580232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vipul Jairath, Brian Bressler, Mark S. Silverberg, L Y Lee, Karen Lugo, T Annamalai, J A Whitney, E Y Weng, B Kanwar, Silvio Danese, B G Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaMount Sinai HospitalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPouchitisMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyTolerabilityProctocolectomyRandomized controlled trialSurgeryAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic pouchitis can occur in up to half of patients within 10 years of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). There is a large unmet need for medical treatments. Methods This was a phase 2, randomized double-blind, parallel-group, 2 active-arm trial of the combined phase 2/3 trial in adults (18-75 years) with a prior history of UC with proctocolectomy and subsequent IPAA, who presented with chronic or recurrent pouchitis. The trial was conducted in US, Canada, and Western Europe. Approximately 20 patients were planned to be randomized 1:1 to either 3 mg or 10 mg AMT-101 doses administered once daily, orally, for 12 weeks. The key efficacy endpoints were: 1) the proportion of patients with symptomatic improvement, as measured by stool frequency response, and 2) the proportion of patients with histologic healing, as measured by Geboes scores. Histology and endoscopy were centrally read. Results 22 patients were randomized to receive AMT-101 3 mg (n=10) or 10 mg (n=12). The mean (SD) baseline absolute stool frequency was 13.4 (4.5). Overall, 36.4% (8/22) of patients achieved stool frequency response, defined as either a reduction of ≥ 3 stools and a ≥ 30% reduction in number of stools from baseline, or a return to post-IPAA number of stools or lower, at Week 12. 40% (4/10) and 33% (4/12) of patients dosed with 3 mg or 10 mg, respectively, achieved stool frequency response at Week 12. Rapidity of stool frequency response was demonstrated as early as Week 2 in both arms and was substantially maintained through Week 12. Patients had a median (IQR) baseline Geboes score of 5.1 (3.2 to 5.2), representing severe pouchitis with ulceration and tissue destruction. Across both arms, 22.7% (5/22) [20.0% (3 mg) and 25.0% (10 mg)] of patients met the histologic healing response of Geboes score ≤ 3.1, an objective assessment of disease improvement. Endoscopic assessments (SES-CD, ≥50% reduction) were also performed, with modest improvements [10% (3 mg) and 8.3% (10 mg)] at Week 12. There was no systemic AMT-101 PK (by design) nor anti-drug antibodies detected. Translational analysis revealed IL-10 biological responses in both arms. In tissue, IHC results showed increases in anti-inflammatory FOXP3+ (Tregs) and CD163+ (M2-macrophages) cells in the lamina propria. Treatment emergent adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, with only one treatment-unrelated serious adverse event. Conclusion AMT-101 3 mg and 10 mg both appeared to be safe and generally well tolerated. PK and translational data confirmed AMT-101’s gut-restricted profile over the 12-week treatment with tissue-level PD effects and no systemic exposure. The AMT-101 3 mg dose is advancing into a Phase 3 trial for chronic pouchitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→