MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318671829 · doi:10.1097/hp.0000000000001657

The Dose Spiking Technique for Measuring Low Doses in Deciduous Teeth Enamel Using EPR Spectroscopy for Retrospective and Accident Dosimetry

2022· article· en· W4318671829 on OpenAlex
Lekhnath Ghimire, Edward Waller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRadiation Effects and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron paramagnetic resonanceDosimetryTooth enamelSpectrometerNuclear magnetic resonanceDosimeterNuclear medicineIsocenterRadiationQuercus petraeaAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AnisotropyChemistryMaterials scienceEnamel paintOpticsMedicinePhysicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Dose estimation by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) has been accomplished using the standard EPR dosimetry technique (ISO protocol 13304-1 for EPR retrospective dosimetry). However, different studies showed that these techniques have high measurement errors in measuring the low doses (10-100 mGy) in enamel. This work proposes a new method to make a dosimetric signal visible and measurable at low doses. The sample was purified using both chemical and mechanical processes. The pure sample mass and position and the EPR acquisition parameters were optimized to enhance the spectrometer's sensitivity for the quantitative low dose measurements. At the same time to reduce errors from the sample and spectrum anisotropy, the total doses (low plus spike) and the spike dose (4 Gy) were measured by rotating 0 to 360 degrees (i.e., 40 degrees at a time) relative to constant magnetic field direction using a goniometer. Subsequently, the spectra were averaged after their g-factor normalization. However, at low doses (<30 mGy), the radiation induced signal (RIS) was obscured by the background signal (BGS). So, the dose spiking technique was used as an alternative method. Ten low-dose deciduous molar tooth enamel (10-100 mGy) samples were spiked to the higher doses by delivering 4 Gy and measured using the X-band continuous wave (CW) EPR (Bruker EMXmicro) spectrometer. The total dose EPR signal was distinctly visible, and the peak-to-peak (P2P) amplitude height was measured. Then, the total dose was subtracted with the spike, often called a reference sample, to determine the initial low doses. The measurement errors using this method were lower than the previous methods. These results demonstrated that this method could be promising for solving low dose measurement problems in EPR dosimetry with deciduous and permanent tooth enamel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it