Differential association of endothelial function with brain structure in youth with versus without bipolar disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mood symptoms and disorders are associated with impaired endothelial function, a marker of early atherosclerosis. Given the increased vascular burden and neurostructural differences among individuals with mood disorders, we investigated the endothelial function and brain structure interface in relation to youth bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: This cross-sectional case-controlled study included 115 youth, ages 13-20 years (n = 66 BD; n = 49 controls [CG]). Cortical thickness and volume for regions of interest (ROI; insular cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex [vlPFC], temporal lobe) were acquired from FreeSurfer processed T1-weighted MRI images. Endothelial function was assessed using pulse amplitude tonometry, yielding a reactive hyperemia index (RHI). ROI and vertex-wise analyses controlling for age, sex, obesity, and intracranial volume investigated for RHI-neurostructural associations, and RHI-by-diagnosis interactions. RESULTS: = 0.01) in the overall sample. In vertex-wise analyses, higher RHI was associated with lower cortical thickness and volume in the insular cortex, prefrontal cortex (e.g., vlPFC), and temporal lobe. Additionally, higher RHI was associated with lower vlPFC and temporal lobe volume to a greater extent in youth with BD vs. CG. CONCLUSIONS: Better endothelial function was associated with lower regional brain thickness and volume, contrasting the hypothesized associations. Additionally, we found evidence that this pattern was exaggerated in youth with BD. Future studies examining the direction of the observed associations and underlying mechanisms are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".