MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318684527 · doi:10.1002/jcsm.13175

Low L3 skeletal muscle index associated with the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of ovarian cancer: a meta‐analysis

2023· review· en· W4318684527 on OpenAlex
Yue Jin, Xiaowei Ma, Zhiyou Yang, Nan Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineSarcopeniaHazard ratioInternal medicineOdds ratioConfidence intervalOncologyMeta-analysisCancerOvarian cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sarcopenia is a syndrome characterized by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength and function, which is one of the most important clinical features of cancer malnutrition, representing a poor prognostic indicator in oncology. Sarcopenia is commonly assessed by measuring the skeletal muscle index (SMI) of the third lumbar spine (L3) using computed tomography (CT). The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to study the association between low SMI and comprehensive clinicopathological characteristics as well as prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. Data were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to 10 June 2022. Studies evaluating the prognostic effect of SMI on ovarian cancer survival or chemotherapy-related side effects were included. The risk of bias and study quality were assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The search strategy yielded 1286 hits in all three databases combined. Thirteen studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis, comprising 1814 patients. Our meta-analysis revealed the significant association between low SMI and progression-free survival (PFS) [P = 0.02; hazard ratio (HR): 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.85], as well as 5-year overall survival (OS) [P = 0.02; odds ratio (OR): 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74]. Low SMI was also obviously associated with body mass index (BMI) < 25 (P < 0.00001; OR: 5.08, 95% CI: 3.54-7.30), FIGO stage (P = 0.02; OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06-2.45) and R0 cytoreduction (P = 0.04;OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.79). There was no correlation between low SMI and histological types, pathological grades and chemotherapy-related toxicity. The quality of the evidence was relatively high according to NOS. Our meta-analysis indicated that sarcopenia assessed by SMI was associated with poor clinical characteristics and adverse prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. Consensus should be reached on standardized cut-off values for defining sarcopenia in patients with ovarian cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it