MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318692599 · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00413

Quantifying Pharyngeal Residue Across the Adult Life Span: Normative Values by Age, Gender, and Swallow Task

2023· article· en· W4318692599 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kendrea L. Garand, Addison Grissett, Mary Mason Corbett, Sonja M. Molfenter, Erica G. Herzberg, Hanjoe Kim, Dahye Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of South CarolinaNorthwestern UniversityNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesFondation Pour l'AuditionNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing FoundationU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsResidue (chemistry)SwallowingNormativeAnimal sciencePsychologyAudiologyMedicineChemistrySurgeryBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: We quantified pharyngeal residue using pixel-based methods in a normative data set, while examining influences of age, gender, and swallow task. Method: One hundred ninety-five healthy participants underwent a videofluoroscopic swallow study following the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) protocol. ImageJ was used to compute Normalized Residue Ratio Scale and the Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) pharyngeal residue measures. Reliability was established. Descriptive statistics were performed for all residue measures. Inferential statistics were performed using ASPEKT total scores (i.e., %C2–4 2 ). Logistic regression models explored predictors of residue versus no residue. Generalized linear mixed models explored predictors of nonzero residue. Spearman rho explored relationships between ASPEKT total residue scores and MBSImP Component 16 (Pharyngeal Residue) scores. Results: Majority of swallows (1,165/1,528; 76.2%) had residue scores of zero. Residue presence (%C2–4 2 > 0) was influenced by age (more in older [ F = 9.908, p = .002]), gender (more in males [ F = 18.70, p < .001]), viscosity (more in pudding, nectar, and honey [ F = 25.30, p < .001]), and volume (more for cup sip [ F = 37.430, p < .001]). When residue was present (363/1,528 = 23.8%), amounts were low ( M = 1% of C2–4 2 , SD = 2.4), and only increasing age was associated with increased residue ( F = 9.008, p = .007) when controlling for gender and swallow task. Increasing residue was incremental (0.01% of C2–4 2 per year). As ASPEKT total residue values increased, MBSImP Component 16 scores also increased. Conclusions: Pharyngeal residue amounts were very low in healthy adults. Residue presence can be influenced by age, gender, and swallow task. However, when present, the amount of pharyngeal residue was only associated with increasing age. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21957221

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchSame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207