Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rabbinic Judaism, the religion of the Torah of Sinai, embodies a theological system.In secular terms, the ancient Israelite Scripture as set forth by the Mishnah, Tosefta, Talmuds, and Midrash-com-pilations~"the Oral Torah"~of late antiquity embodies a coherent theological system.In this book, I set forth the principal parts of that system and show how it works.It is a system that translates into governing principles the implications of Scripture's narratives, laws, and prophecies.That system recasts the mythic monotheism~ monotheism set forth through the narrative of Scripture~into a working theology for holy Israel's cosmic and social order, which is spelled out here.How does monotheism frame its theology and the issues thereof?A religion of numerous gods finds many solutions to one problem, a religion of only one God presents one solution to many problems.How so?Life is seldom fair.Rules work only sometimes.To explain the reason why, polytheisms adduce multiple causes of chaos, a god per anomaly.Diverse gods do various things, so, it stands to reason, ordinarily outcomes conflict.Monotheism by nature explains many things in a single way.One God rules.Life is meant to be fair, and just rules are supposed to describe what is ordinary, all in the name of that one and only God.So in monotheism a simple logic governs to limit ways of making sense of things.But that logic contains its own dialectics, contradictory principles that require resolution.If one true God has done everything, then, since he is God all-powerful and omniscient, all things are credited to, and blamed on, him.In that case, given the human condition, he can be either good or bad, just or unjust~but not both.Responding to the generative dialectics of monotheism, Rabbinic Judaism systematically reveals the justice of the one and only God of all creation.God is not only God but also good.Appealing to the facts of Scripture, the written part of the Torah, in the documents of the oral part of the Torah, the sages in the first six centuries of the Common Era constructed a coherent theology, a cogent structure and logical system, to expose the justice of God.Here in detail I
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.352 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".