MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318716011 · doi:10.1163/9789004496491_002

Preface

2002· book-chapter· en· W4318716011 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jacob Neusner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Classical Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rabbinic Judaism, the religion of the Torah of Sinai, embodies a theological system.In secular terms, the ancient Israelite Scripture as set forth by the Mishnah, Tosefta, Talmuds, and Midrash-com-pilations~"the Oral Torah"~of late antiquity embodies a coherent theological system.In this book, I set forth the principal parts of that system and show how it works.It is a system that translates into governing principles the implications of Scripture's narratives, laws, and prophecies.That system recasts the mythic monotheism~ monotheism set forth through the narrative of Scripture~into a working theology for holy Israel's cosmic and social order, which is spelled out here.How does monotheism frame its theology and the issues thereof?A religion of numerous gods finds many solutions to one problem, a religion of only one God presents one solution to many problems.How so?Life is seldom fair.Rules work only sometimes.To explain the reason why, polytheisms adduce multiple causes of chaos, a god per anomaly.Diverse gods do various things, so, it stands to reason, ordinarily outcomes conflict.Monotheism by nature explains many things in a single way.One God rules.Life is meant to be fair, and just rules are supposed to describe what is ordinary, all in the name of that one and only God.So in monotheism a simple logic governs to limit ways of making sense of things.But that logic contains its own dialectics, contradictory principles that require resolution.If one true God has done everything, then, since he is God all-powerful and omniscient, all things are credited to, and blamed on, him.In that case, given the human condition, he can be either good or bad, just or unjust~but not both.Responding to the generative dialectics of monotheism, Rabbinic Judaism systematically reveals the justice of the one and only God of all creation.God is not only God but also good.Appealing to the facts of Scripture, the written part of the Torah, in the documents of the oral part of the Torah, the sages in the first six centuries of the Common Era constructed a coherent theology, a cogent structure and logical system, to expose the justice of God.Here in detail I

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5590.367

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedieval and Classical PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207