MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318824220 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.220881

Restoring Balance: Immune Tolerance in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2023· review· en· W4318824220 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jaspreet Kaur, Ewa Cairns, Lillian Barra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisImmunologyImmune systemDiseaseImmunosuppressionAutoimmunityImmune dysregulationAutoimmune diseaseArthritisImmune toleranceInflammationAdverse effectInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic musculoskeletal disease where immune dysregulation and subsequent autoimmunity induce significant synovial joint inflammation and damage, causing pain and disability. RA disease onset is promoted through multifaceted interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors. However, the mechanisms of disease onset are not completely understood and disease-specific treatments are yet to be developed. Current RA treatments include nonspecific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that suppress destructive immune responses and prevent damage. However, DMARDs are not curative, and relapses are common, necessitating lifelong therapy in most patients. Additionally, DMARD-induced systemic immunosuppression increases the risk of serious infections and malignancies. Herein, we review the current understanding of RA disease pathogenesis, with a focus on T and B cell immune tolerance breakdown, and discuss the development of antigen-specific RA therapeutics that aim to restore a state of immune tolerance, with the potential for disease prevention and reduction of treatment-associated adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→