MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318832754 · doi:10.55275/jposna-2023-619

A Comprehensive Umbrella Review for Understanding Burnout in Orthopaedic Surgery

2023· article· en· W4318832754 on OpenAlexaff
Maike van Niekerk, Kali Tileston, Maryse F. Bouchard, Melissa A. Christino, Rachel Y. Goldstein, George Gantsoudes, Cordelia Carter, Alfred Atanda

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnoutOrthopedic surgeryPsychologyMedicineSurgeryClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Burnout is a work-related syndrome characterized by depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, and low personal achievement. Occupational demands can lead to burnout in orthopaedic surgeons, negatively impacting patients and surgeons alike. Several systematic reviews have summarized the literature on specific aspects of burnout in orthopaedic surgery, or on orthopaedic surgeons as a subgroup in their analyses, but a high-level overview of this field is lacking. Aims: We, therefore, aimed to conduct an umbrella review (i.e., review of reviews) summarizing evidence on burnout in orthopedic surgery, focusing on its rates, associations, prevention, and management. Methods: We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, and CENTRAL from database inception to 16 July 2022, using the terms “orthopedic surgery”, “burnout”, and “review”. Quality assessments were conducted using the PASS checklist. An article was considered for inclusion if it was a review, summarized evidence on burnout in orthopedic surgery, and had a full text available to allow for data extraction. We present the results of our review using narrative syntheses. Results: We included eight systematic reviews and eight narrative reviews. We found burnout to be common among orthopedic surgeons, although reviews reported variable rates, thereby precluding definitive conclusions. Residents were found to be particularly at risk of experiencing burnout, with estimates of one in two being affected. Burnout was found to be positively associated with several personal-related factors (including identifying as a female or as a racial minority, experiencing work-life imbalances, and not having spousal support), as well as work-related factors (including working long hours, having stressful work relationships, and experiencing anxiety about one’s clinical competence). Literature on interventions for preventing and managing burnout was limited, although there was some evidence supporting work-hour restrictions for residents. Conclusions: Although burnout is detrimental for orthopaedic surgeons and their patients, high-quality literature in this field is scarce. Future efforts should be dedicated to conducting large-scale, prospective studies to examine burnout rates and associations as well as interventional studies to prevent and manage burnout. We provide recommendations to guide such efforts in our complementary paper on system-level interventions for burnout in orthopedic surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North AmericaSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207