Synthesis of Chitosan Capped Zinc Sulphide Nanoparticle Composites as an Antibacterial Agent for Liquid Handwash Disinfectant Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a need to develop alternative disinfectants that differ from conventional antibiotics to address antibacterial resistance, along with specialized materials for biomedical applications. Herein, we report on the synthesis of zinc sulfide (ZnS) capped with chitosan (CS) to produce CS-ZnS nanocomposites (NCs), which were assayed for antibacterial activity in liquid handwash formulations. The CS-ZnS NCs were prepared using the bottom-up wet-chemical method. The role of CS as the capping agent was investigated by varying the ratio of CS with respect to the ZnS precursor. The prepared CS-ZnS NCs were characterized using complementary spectral methods: scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. The antibacterial activities of liquid handwash (LH) formulations containing 1% (w/w) CS-ZnS NCs were tested against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using the agar diffusion test method. This LH formulation displayed antibacterial activity against S. aureus with an average inhibition zone diameter in the range of 16.9–19.1 mm, and met the quality standards set by the National Standardization Agency. The formulated LH solutions containing CS-ZnS NCs showed antibacterial activity, which suggests that the CS-ZnS NCs have potential as an alternative active ingredient for tailored and non-irritant antibacterial LH detergents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it