Deep Learning-Based Emulation of Radiative Transfer Models for Top-of-Atmosphere BRDF Modelling Using Sentinel-3 OLCI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) defines the anisotropy of surface reflectance and plays a fundamental role in many remote sensing applications. This study proposes a new machine learning-based model for characterizing the BRDF. The model integrates the capability of Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) to generate simulated remote sensing data with the power of deep neural networks to emulate, learn and approximate the complex pattern of physical RTMs for BRDF modeling. To implement this idea, we used a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) trained with a dataset simulated using two widely used RTMs: PROSAIL and 6S. The proposed 1D-CNN consists of convolutional, max poling, and dropout layers that collaborate to establish a more efficient relationship between the input and output variables from the coupled PROSAIL and 6S yielding a robust, fast, and accurate BRDF model. We evaluated the proposed approach performance using a collection of an independent testing dataset. The results indicated that the proposed framework for BRDF modeling performed well at four simulated Sentinel-3 OLCI bands, including Oa04 (blue), Oa06 (green), Oa08 (red), and Oa17 (NIR), with a mean correlation coefficient of around 0.97, and RMSE around 0.003 and an average relative percentage error of under 4%. Furthermore, to assess the performance of the developed network in the real domain, a collection of multi-temporals OLCI real data was used. The results indicated that the proposed framework has a good performance in the real domain with a coefficient correlation (R2), 0.88, 0.76, 0.7527, and 0.7560 respectively for the blue, green, red, and NIR bands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".