Abstract WP223: Identification Of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy With A Leukocyte Gene Expression Profile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a cerebral small vessel disease featuring beta-amyloid deposits within the cerebral vasculature. It is a major cause of cognitive decline and intracerebral hemorrhage in the elderly. This study evaluated whether gene expression profiles in peripheral blood can differentiate patients with CAA from vascular risk factor and healthy controls. Methods: In 27 patients with CAA blood cell gene expression was compared to 55 controls. Total RNA was isolated from PAXgene tubes and measured by RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed genes between CAA and controls were identified by ANOVA adjusting for age and sex. Functional pathway analysis identified pathways associated with CAA. A prediction model to distinguish CAA from controls was developed using linear discriminant analysis with feature selection by forward selection. Model performance was evaluated by 10-fold leave-one-out cross validation. Results: 686 differentially expressed genes were identified (p<0.05, fold change >|1.2|), of interest ADAM15, CAMK1D, CAP1 and TGFB1 . Canonical pathway analysis identified cell movement of phagocytes, activation of phagocytes, CREB, degranulation of leukocytes, immune response of cells, inflammatory response, and IL-23 signaling. A 24 gene panel differentiated patients with CAA from controls with >95% sensitivity and specificity. The identified genes reveal differences in immune system regulation in patients with CAA compared to vascular risk factor and healthy control patients. Differences identified include a potential shift in beta-amyloid uptake by phagocytes ( TGFB1, CREB, CAMK1D ), an increase in vascular extracellular matrix disruption ( ADAM15, CAP1 ), and a possible alteration in amyloid precursor processing ( BRI3BP, SORCS3 ). Conclusion: Differences in peripheral leukocyte gene expression are present in patients with CAA compared to control patients. These relate to differences in immune activation and signaling associated with CAA. The differences in blood cell gene expression shows promise to distinguish CAA from controls, though further evaluation in larger cohorts is required to further evaluate potential diagnostic utility of this gene expression profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".