MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319008742 · doi:10.1161/str.54.suppl_1.tp8

Abstract TP8: Apparent Diffusion Coefficientvalue Could Be The New Perspective To Ascertain Effectiveness Of Mechanical Thrombectomy In Large Ischemic Regions

2023· article· en· W4319008742 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Takeru Umemura, Taketo Hatano, Takenori Ogura, Takeshi Miyata, Yuji Agawa, Izumi Nagata

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleEffective diffusion coefficientMagnetic resonance imagingDiffusion MRIStroke (engine)Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance ImagingNuclear medicineIschemic strokeRetrospective cohort studyCohortRadiologySurgeryIschemiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Recently, we reported that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values are independently associated with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) reversal, and DWI lesions with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s are salvageable by mechanical thrombectomy. These areas regain neurological function. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy in especially large ischemic regions with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with successful recanalization between April 2017 and March 2021. DWI reversal was assessed through follow-up magnetic resonance imaging 24 h after treatment. Cases with Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS)-DWI values 3-5 were enrolled in this study. They were classified as DWI lesions with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s and mean ADC < 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s. The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-3 (on a scale of 0-6) at 3 months. Results: In total, ASPECTS-DWI values 3-5 were confirmed in 20 patients. Six patients had DWI lesions with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s, and the remaining 14 patients had DWI lesions with mean ADC < 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s. DWI reversals were significantly larger in cases with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s than in those with mean ADC < 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s (p=.049). The mRS scores at 3 months in cases with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s and ADC < 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s were 3 (0.75-3.75) and 5 (4-6), respectively. mRS score was significantly improved in cases with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s than in cases with mean ADC < 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s (p=.011). Conclusions: In large ischemic regions (ASPECTS-DWI: 3-5), DWI lesions with mean ADC ≥ 520 х 10 -6 mm 2 /s are associated with preferable outcomes. The ADC value is easily assessed and a useful tool to predict viable lesions. Therefore, the ADC value could be a new perspective to ascertain the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy in large ischemic regions. ABBREVIATIONS: ASPECTS = Alberta stroke program early CT score; ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; mRS = modified Rankin scale

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207