MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Prevalence of HIV, Sexual Practices and Behaviors among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

2022· article· en· W4319013661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D Mukadi-Bamuleka, H Mbowlie-Nsabala, Ngenzie-Oponga LS, A Dilu-Keti, Bernice Danga-Yema, Patrick I. Mpingabo, Ndaye AN, J Lasse, Fabrice Mambu-Mbika, François Edidi-Atani, Y Bonkoto-Nkoyi, H Manienga, S Mashimango, J Bulabula-Penge, Muyembe-Tamfum Jj, S Ahuka-Mundeke

Bibliographic record

VenueAustin Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMen who have sex with menMedicineDemographySnowball samplingHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PopulationPublic healthQuarter (Canadian coin)GerontologyEnvironmental healthSyphilisVirologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a deadly sex-transmitted infection (STI) that remains a worldwide public health concern. Despite the progress recorded in the HIV prevention, we still observe high HIV prevalence especially among Men who have sex with Men (MSM). Within this latter group, the prevalence of HIV is reported to be higher and can therefore be transposed into the general population through the bisexuals. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the response to HIV/AIDS among MSM requires updated data on the magnitude of the infection, the sexual practices and behaviors which are key factors in the pandemic spread. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HIV and to describe the sexual practices and behaviors among MSM recruited in Kinshasa, DRC. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from March 2014 to December 2017 to recruit MSM through the snowball technique in Kinshasa, DRC. Our data were collected on a paper-printed questionnaire via an interview followed by whole blood sample collection for ELISA assays. Of 323 MSM recruited, the MSM were single in 88.5% (286/323) and bisexuals in 61.7% (195/316). Nine percent of them were HIV positive (30/323) at the ELISA assays. The prevalence of HIV was 40% (12/30) in the 21-25 age group; 50% (15/30) in MSM with superior education level; 85.1% (23/27) among single MSM. Almost the quarter of the MSM had > 5 homosexual partners in the last six months; 5.5% (18/323) had more than 20 homosexual intercourses while 13.3% (43/323) of them contracted 3-5 heterosexual sex acts in the last three months. During anal intercourses, 34.4% (110/319) played a passive role versus 24.1% (77/319) for a versatile role. The condom use was systematically reported in 27.2% (87/319) of participants. The MSM were one time likely to the HIV infection when they had a high education level [aOR 3.63(1.37-9.57)]. The fact of practicing more than three types of intercourse-anal, oral and others was five times more likely to be at risk for the HIV acquisition [aOR 5.31 (1.26-22.30)]. This study reports a high prevalence of HIV among MSM which is associated with the high-risk sexual practices and behaviors such as the bisexuality, the multiple sexual partners, and the diversity of anal intercourses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustin Journal of Infectious Diseases→Same topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk→French-language works237,207→