MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319066157 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100939

Forced, natural and mixed convection of Non-Newtonian fluid flows in a square chamber with moving lid and discrete bottom heating

2023· article· en· W4319066157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of AlbertaBangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
KeywordsNusselt numberGrashof numberNatural convectionRichardson numberMechanicsFilm temperatureThermodynamicsHeat transferForced convectionCombined forced and natural convectionReynolds numberHeat transfer coefficientChurchill–Bernstein equationBuoyancyMaterials sciencePhysicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the present study is to examine the thermal performance of a power-law fluid for a discretely heated lid-driven enclosure. This numerical outcome can determine the ideal heat transfer medium for a given design, thus reducing unnecessary expenditures on experiments. The chamber's side walls move at a constant speed under constant ambient conditions. The finite element approach is used to solve governing Navier-Stokes and energy equations. A parametric investigation is carried out by varying the Richardson number (Ri) within the range of 2 × 10−3 ≤ Ri ≤ 105 at a fixed Reynolds or Grashof number in different cases and changing them simultaneously while keeping the Richardson number at unity. In all cases, the power-law index (n) is varied within 0.6 ≤ n ≤ 1.4. The results have been presented in terms of a quantitative evaluation of the average Nusselt number of the heated source, the average fluid temperature of the chamber, the maximum temperature of the heat source, and the normalized average Nusselt number. Furthermore, qualitative contour plots of stream function and temperature for different cases are presented. This research shows that the higher the power-law index, the greater the heat transfer for forced and pure mixed convection and that heat transfer performance differs with the increment/decrement of the Richardson number while keeping either Reynolds or Grashof number constant. Besides, the highest heat transfer performance is observed during the natural convection case of the pseudo-plastic fluid, and the lowest heat is transferred when the fluid is dilatant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it