Inkjet-Printed Ferrite Substrate-Based Vialess Waveguide Phase Shifter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetically controlled waveguide-based phase shifters are desirable for their high performance, but are bulky and heavy, thus cannot be easily integrated with printed circuit board (PCB) based circuits. To tackle this, substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) technology has been utilized, which brings the waveguide to a standard PCB, but requires large numbers of vias as well as multiple cavities in the substrate for ferrite slab placement. This implementation technique involves complex fabrication and yields a relatively low figure of merit (FoM). To alleviate this, we present the first completely vialess ferrite substrate-based waveguide phase shifter realized through low-cost inkjet printing technique. All the four sides of a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) substrate have been metalized through inkjet printing, allowing the fabrication of a conventional rectangular waveguide on a standard magnetic substrate. The prototype has been tested in symmetric as well as antisymmetric modes of biasing and peak FoMs of 160°/dB at 7.22 GHz and 332°/dB at 7.46 GHz have been measured, which are higher than those of the previously reported designs. This all-around inkjet printing approach can open the door to low-cost, integrable magnetic phase shifters with excellent RF performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".