MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319157633 · doi:10.37867/te140219

CARBOHYDRATE, LIPID AND PROTEIN PROFILE IN CATOPSILIA PYRANTHE TREATED WITH VARIOUS CONCENTRATIONS OF SUGARS AND NECTARS

2022· article· en· W4319157633 on OpenAlex
Bhanu R. Solanki, Archana Mankad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTowards Excellence · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNectarSucroseLepidoptera genitaliaBiologySugarPollinatorFecundityBotanyCarbohydrateAnimal scienceFructoseFood scienceHorticulturePollinationPollenBiochemistryMedicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order of Lepidoptera, butterflies are the most aesthetic insects which adds beauty to our ecosystem as well as they are the pollinators. Anthropogenic activities are hindering their survival and thus it is the time to conserve them to maintain biodiversity. Nectars are the rewards for such pollinators and their good variety can be able to maintain their coexistence. Sugar concentration in nectars varies and directly affects its mortality, fecundity and physiological, behavioral changes. The present study focuses on the physiological changes of butterflies after treating them with four different concentrations of sucrose (10 %, 20 %, 30 % and 40 %) and four different nectars on which (Catopsilia pyranthe) mottled emigrants generally feed on the field. Also the wild butterflies were collected and were compared with the control, sucrose concentrations and four varieties of nectar diets. Sucrose is selected for the treatment as it is available in nectar at higher amounts. The best results of total carbohydrates in males (0.581 ± 0.059 mg/ml) as well as females (0.509 ± 0.137 mg/ml) were recorded in Vinca rosea treated individuals, glycogen in 40 % sucrose treatments in both male (0.580 ± 0.075 mg/ml) and female (0.614 ± 0.0304 mg/ml), total lipids again in 40 % sucrose treatments in both male (0.850 ± 0.431 mg/ml) and female (0.726 ± 0.1106 mg/ml) and total proteins in wild (1.985 ± 1.782 mg/ml) in male and in 40 % sucrose (1.681 ± 0.111 mg/ml) in female individuals. In SDS PAGE, the highest number of bands of different molecular weights observed in males are Lantana camara, Vinca rosea, Stachytarpheta cayennensis treated and Wild butterflies while in female individuals, it is in Vinca rosea treated and Wild butterflies. The study also presents the 3D structures with the help of peptide search by Uniprot and homology modeling with the help of Swissprot. It is an attempt to represent the variety of physiological changes that occur due to the different concentration of sugars so it can help for further maintenance of nectar plants and ultimately to maintain our ecosystem by conserving pollinators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it