Cratonal tidal deposits of the Paleoproterozoic Mesnard Quartzite, Lake Superior region: interpretation challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mesnard Quartzite of Paleoproterozoic age is believed to represent among the first preserved cratonal continental rocks in the Lake Superior region, was deposited above Archean basement in the Marquette structural trough and is estimated to contain more than 99% sandstone (now quartzite) beds. The Mesnard Quartzite is interpreted to have been deposited largely by tidal currents. Evidence of tidal current deposition includes lack of wave-influenced structures such as hummocky cross-beds, and presence of strongly unidirectional paleocurrents from cross-beds, mud-drapes on cross-bed foresets, evidence of current reversal including herringbone cross-bedding and sigmoidal cross-bedding. Sandstone bedding types include homogeneous or structureless beds, parallel-laminated beds, cross-beds, and symmetric ripple marks. Unidirectional paleocurrents from cross-beds are largely subparallel to the axis of the Marquette structural trough, leading to the interpretation that the trough was subsiding during deposition. Cross-bed set thickness and symmetric ripple marks both support the interpretation of shallow water marine deposition, likely only a few meters. Although the Mesnard Quartzite is on the order of 110 m thick, there is no evidence of internal sequence boundaries or flooding surfaces, and low accommodation during deposition is inferred. The climate during deposition is interpreted to be humid, and tropical to subtropical based on the quartz arenite composition. Deposition likely occurred in a failed rift basin or in an intracratonic extensional basin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".