MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319300616 · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00355

FastSwap: A Lightweight One-Stage Framework for Real-Time Face Swapping

2023· article· en· W4319300616 on OpenAlexaff
Sahng-Min Yoo, Tae-Min Choi, Jae-Woo Choi, Jong-Hwan Kim

Bibliographic record

Venue2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNormalization (sociology)Block (permutation group theory)High fidelityFace (sociological concept)FidelityComputationArtificial intelligenceFacial recognition systemMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent face swapping frameworks have achieved high-fidelity results. However, the previous works suffer from high computation costs due to the deep structure and the use of off-the-shelf networks. To overcome such problems and achieve real-time face swapping, we propose a lightweight one-stage framework, FastSwap. We design a shallow network trained in a self-supervised manner without any manual annotations. The core of our framework is a novel decoder block, called Triple Adaptive Normalization (TAN) block, which effectively integrates the identity and pose information. Besides, we propose a novel data augmentation and switch-test strategy to extract the attributes from the target image, which further enables controllable attribute editing. Extensive experiments on VoxCeleb2 and wild faces demonstrate that our framework generates high-fidelity face swapping results in 123.22 FPS and better preserves the identity, pose, and attributes than other state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth study to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207