MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319300757 · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00347

Scaling Neural Face Synthesis to High FPS and Low Latency by Neural Caching

2023· article· en· W4319300757 on OpenAlexaff
Frank Yu, Sidney Fels, Helge Rhodin

Bibliographic record

Venue2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)Image warpingFrame rateArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceTeleconferenceLatency (audio)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent neural rendering approaches greatly improve image quality, reaching near photorealism. However, the underlying neural networks have high runtime, precluding telepresence and virtual reality applications that require high resolution at low latency. The sequential dependency of layers in deep networks makes their optimization difficult. We break this dependency by caching information from the previous frame to speed up the processing of the current one with an implicit warp. The warping with a shallow network reduces latency and the caching operations can further be parallelized to improve the frame rate. In contrast to existing temporal neural networks, ours is tailored for the task of rendering novel views of faces by conditioning on the change of the underlying surface mesh. We test the approach on view-dependent rendering of 3D portrait avatars, as needed for telepresence, on established benchmark sequences. Warping reduces latency by 70% (from 49.4ms to 14.9ms on commodity GPUs) and scales frame rates accordingly over multiple GPUs while reducing image quality by only 1%, making it suitable as part of end-to-end view-dependent 3D teleconferencing applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207