MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319302816 · doi:10.1109/tec.2023.3242876

Multi-Segment State of Health Estimation of Lithium-ion Batteries Considering Short Partial Charging

2023· article· en· W4319302816 on OpenAlexafffund
Meng Zhan, Kofi Afrifa Agyeman, Xiaoyu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersOntario Centre of Innovation
KeywordsState of healthVoltageRobustness (evolution)EstimatorPartial dischargeComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsElectrical engineeringBattery (electricity)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

State of health (SOH) is a critical state parameter of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Health indicators (HIs), which are derived from the measured features of LIBs, are used in the current data-driven SOH estimation techniques to determine SOH. However, the common partial charging and discharging make it challenging to derive reliable HIs. In this paper, a SOH estimation approach considering short partial charging is proposed. Unlike other techniques, the constant current charging stage is divided into short segments, the HI, based on the charging capacity and actual initial charging voltage, is extracted within each short segment, and a kernel ridge regression-based estimator is created to characterize the SOH mapping relationship. Subsequently, an estimator fusion frame is established to merge the estimates of the eligible segments, which is decided based on the actual start and end charging voltages of the partial charging. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated with two well-known LIBs aging datasets containing real partial charging cycles. The results are satisfactory in terms of accuracy, robustness to partial charging, and good generality to different types of LIBs. Effective SOH value can be deduced whenever the charging voltage range covers at least one short estimation segment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207