Chronological changes in phase-amplitude coupling during epileptic seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To analyze chronological changes in phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) and verify whether PAC analysis can diagnose epileptogenic zones during seizures. We analyzed 30 seizures in 10 patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who had ictal discharges with preictal spiking followed by low-voltage fast activity patterns on intracranial electroencephalography. We used the amplitude of two high-frequency bands (ripples: 80–200 Hz, fast ripples: 200–300 Hz) and the phase of three slow wave bands (0.5–1 Hz, 3–4 Hz, and 4–8 Hz) for modulation index (MI) calculation from 2 minutes before seizure onset to seizure termination. We evaluated the accuracy of epileptogenic zone detection by MI, in which a combination of MI was better for diagnosis and analyzed patterns of chronological changes in MI during seizures. MIRipples/3–4 Hz and MIRipples/4–8 Hz in the hippocampus were significantly higher than those in the peripheral regions from seizure onset. Corresponding to the phase on intracranial electroencephalography, MIRipples/3–4 Hz decreased once and subsequently increased again. MIRipples/4–8 Hz showed continuously high values. Continuous measurement of MIRipples/3–4 Hz and MIRipples/4–8 Hz could help identify epileptogenic zones. PAC analysis of ictal epileptic discharges can help epileptogenic zone identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".