MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319309615 · doi:10.1109/ickg55886.2022.00037

HTransE: Hybrid Translation-based Embedding for Knowledge Graphs

2022· article· en· W4319309615 on OpenAlexaff
Akshay Shah, Bonaventure C. Molokwu, Ziad Kobti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersInternational Business Machines Corporation
KeywordsEmbeddingSimple (philosophy)Theoretical computer scienceRelation (database)Computer scienceKnowledge graphInverseMathematicsGraphArtificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basically, a Knowledge Graph (KG) is a graph variant that represents data via triplets comprising a head, a tail, and a relation. Realistically, most KGs are compiled either manually or semi-automatically, and this usually results in a significant loss of vital information with respect to the KG. Thus, this problem of incompleteness is common to virtually all KGs; and it is formally defined as Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) problem. In this paper, we have explored learning the representations of a KGs with regard to its entities and relations for the purpose of any predicting missing link(s). In that regard, this paper proposes a hybrid variant, composed of TransE and SimplE models, for solving KGC problems. On one hand, the TransE model depicts a relation as the translation from the source entity (head) to the target entity (tail) within an embedding space. In TransE, the head and tail entities are derived from the same embedding-generation class, which results in a low prediction score. Also, the TransE model is not able to capture symmetric relationships as well as one-to-many relationships. On the other hand, the SimplE model is based on Canonical Polyadic (CP) decomposition. SimplE enhances CP via the addition of the inverse relation, while the head entity and tail entity are derived from different embedding-generation classes which are interdependent. Hence, we employed the principle of inverse-relation embedding (from the SimplE model) onto the native TransE model so as to yield a new hybrid resultant: HTransE. Therefore, HTransE boasts of efficiency as well as improved prediction scores. Efficiently, HTransE converges much quicker in comparison to TransE. In other words, HTransE converges at approximately$n/2$iterations where$n$denotes the iterations required to fully train TransE. Our results outperform the native TransE approach with a significant difference. Also, HTransE outperforms several state-of-the-art models on different datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207