Application of Machine Learning to Predict the Mechanical Characteristics of Concrete Containing Recycled Plastic-Based Materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the practical ways to overcome the adverse environmental effects of plastic bottle waste is to implement bottles into concrete, one of the most widely used materials in the construction industry. Plastic bottles are mainly made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and can be used as a fiber to reinforce concrete. In recent years, PET fiber-reinforced concrete (PFRC) has attracted researcher attention, and several experimental studies have been conducted. This paper aims to present the benefits of using PET fiber as a reinforcing element in concrete using a machine learning approach. By considering the effect of PET fibers in concrete, engineers and stakeholders may be encouraged to further use these recycled materials. The proposed network was successfully able to capture the response of PFRC with high accuracy (mean squared error (MSE) of 7.11 MPa and R coefficient of 98%). The results of the proposed network show that the amount of PET fiber usage in concrete has a significant effect on the compressive strength of PFRC. Moreover, the PFRC’s response considering the variation of mechanical and geometrical properties of PET fiber mainly depends on the fiber’s shape. The most effective shapes of PET fiber are shapes with deformation, followed by embossed and irregular shapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".