MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4319333139 · doi:10.1111/hdi.13072

<scp>COVID</scp>‐19 vaccination status impact on mortality in end‐stage kidney disease

2023· letter· en· W4319333139 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Derek Blankenship, Len A. Usvyat, Rachel Lasky, Franklin W. Maddux

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFresenius Medical Care North America
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)End stage renal diseaseEnd-stage kidney diseaseHemodialysisVaccination2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)DiseaseStage (stratigraphy)VirologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are particularly vulnerable to adverse clinical outcomes associated with COVID-19, with an estimated 20%-30% mortality risk.[1][2][3][4] There is limited information on clinical outcomes, including mortality, following vaccination among patients on dialysis, with many relevant phase 3 trials excluding patients with "serious kidney disease" and chronic conditions.5 To characterize the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality, we conducted a retrospective analysis using data from all US adults (i.e., aged ≥18 years) with ESKD receiving dialysis through Fresenius Medical Care (FMC) between March 1 and September 18, 2021.Data for a total of 239,660 patients were available with clinical and demographic, including vaccination status, being updated throughout the study period.As of March 1, 2021, 16,140 patients were classified as fully vaccinated (defined as the time period beginning 2 weeks after either an Ad26.COV2.S vaccination or a second mRNA vaccination), 39,938 were partially vaccinated (defined as the time period up to 2 weeks after vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S or the period from initial vaccination to 2 weeks after a second mRNA vaccination), and 114,403 were unvaccinated (defined as having no COVID-19 vaccination history).Among patients at the start of the study period (N = 170,481), 13.8% were on peritoneal dialysis, 3.8% were on home hemodialysis, and 82.4% were on in-center hemodialysis, 42.6% were female, 63.9% had a history of diabetes, and 51.6% were younger than age 65.Patient demographics remained relatively consistent throughout the study period.Overall, 102,717 patient-years of follow-up were available for analysis: 30,689 for unvaccinated patients, 14,478 for partially vaccinated patients, and 57,550 for fully vaccinated patients.During the analysis period, 19,356 deaths occurred, equating to an overall mortality rate of 18.8 deaths per 100 patient-years.The unadjusted rate of death (per 100 patient-years) was 29.6, 13.8, and 14.4 among unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, and fully vaccinated patients, respectively.When adjusted for sex, age, race/ ethnicity, diabetes history, and US geographic region, the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts→French-language works237,207→