MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319340680 · doi:10.1101/2023.02.07.527440

The Dual Action of Human Antibodies Specific to <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> PfRH5 and PfCyRPA: Blocking Invasion and Inactivating Extracellular Merozoites

2023· preprint· en· W4319340680 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Greta E. Weiss, Robert J. Ragotte, Doris Quinkert, Amelia M. Lias, Madeline G. Dans, Coralie Boulet, Barnabas G. Williams, Brendan S. Crabb, Simon J. Draper, Paul R. Gilson

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilBurnet InstituteWellcome TrustCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Health and Medical Research CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsBasiginPlasmodium falciparumEpitopeMonoclonal antibodyBiologyAntibodyExtracellularCell biologyImmunologyMalariaBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (PfRH5) is the current leading blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate. PfRH5 functions as part of the pentameric PCRCR complex containing PTRAMP, CSS, PfCyRPA and PfRIPR, all of which are essential for infection of human red blood cells (RBCs). To trigger RBC invasion, PfRH5 engages with RBC protein basigin in a step termed the RH5-basigin binding stage. Although we know increasingly more about how antibodies specific for PfRH5 can block invasion, much less is known about how antibodies recognizing other members of the PCRCR complex can inhibit invasion. To address this, we performed live cell imaging using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) which bind PfRH5 and PfCyRPA. We measured the degree and timing of the invasion inhibition, the stage at which it occurred, as well as subsequent events. We show that parasite invasion is blocked by individual mAbs, and the degree of inhibition is enhanced when combining a mAb specific for PfRH5 with one binding PfCyRPA. In addition to directly establishing the invasion-blocking capacity of the mAbs, we identified a secondary action of certain mAbs on extracellular parasites that had not yet invaded where the mAbs appeared to inactivate the parasites by triggering a developmental pathway normally only seen after successful invasion. These findings suggest that epitopes within the PfCyRPA-PfRH5 sub-complex that elicit these dual responses may be more effective immunogens than neighboring epitopes by both blocking parasites from invading and rapidly inactivating extracellular parasites. These two protective mechanisms, prevention of invasion and inactivation of uninvaded parasites, resulting from antibody to a single epitope indicate a possible route to the development of more effective vaccines. Author Summary Malaria is a sometimes-fatal disease caused by protozoan parasites of which Plasmodium falciparum is the most deadly species that causes hundreds of millions of infections and half a million deaths per year. A partially effective vaccine is available to block parasite forms transmitted by mosquitoes but not the subsequent blood stage which causes symptomatic disease. To fight blood stage parasites, proteins have been identified such as PfRH5, that aid parasite entry into human red blood cells (RBCs) and vaccines made from these proteins can trigger the production of antibodies that bind the parasite proteins thereby blocking RBC invasion. PfRH5 forms a complex with another parasite protein called PfCyRPA and together antibodies to PfCyRPA and PfRH5 are highly effective in reducing parasite growth. Here we investigated how antibodies to PfCyRPA and PfRH5 actually block invasion using video microscopy of live parasites. As anticipated, we found the antibodies not only stopped most parasites from invading but of those parasites that did invade, they took longer to do so, suggesting the antibodies were physically inhibiting the invasion process. One unanticipated effect of both PfRH5 antibodies and one of three PfCyRPA antibodies tested, was that they triggered the uninvaded parasites to change into cellular forms normally only seen inside RBCs. These intracellular forms are no longer competent to invade and so the PfRH5/CyRPA antibodies have the potential of both neutralize parasites by physically preventing RBC entry and by changing the parasites into invasion incompetent forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207