Study of Genetic Variation in Bermuda Grass along Longitudinal and Latitudinal Gradients Using Spectral Reflectance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic variation among populations within plant species can have huge impact on canopy biochemistry and structure across broad spatial scales. Since canopy spectral reflectance is determined largely by canopy biochemistry and structure, spectral reflectance can be used as a means to capture the variability of th genetic characteristics of plant species. In this study, we used spectral measurements of Bermuda grass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] at both the leaf and canopy levels to characterize the variability of plant traits pertinent to phylogeographic variation along the longitudinal and latitudinal gradients. An integration of airborne multispectral and hyperspectral data allows for the exploitation of spectral variations to discriminate between the five different genotypic groups using ANOVA and RF models. We evaluated the spectral variability among high-latitude genotypic groups and other groups along the latitudinal gradients and assessed spectral variability along longitudinal gradients. Spectral difference was observed between genetic groups from the northern regions and those from other regions along the latitudinal gradient, which indicated the usefulness of spectral signatures for discriminating between genetic groups. The canopy spectral reflectance was better suited to discriminate between genotypes of Bermuda grass across multiple scales than leaf spectral data, as assessed using random forest models. The use of spectral reflectance, derived from remote sensing, for studying genetic variability across landscapes is becoming an emerging research topic, with the potential to monitor and forecast phenology, evolution and biodiversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".