MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accelerating biophysical studies and applications by label-free nanopore sensing

2023· article· en· W4319456261 on OpenAlex
Hirohito Yamazaki, Kan Shoji

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiophysics and Physicobiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersExploratory Research for Advanced Technology
KeywordsNanoporeNanotechnologyComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Label-free single-molecule sensing technologies are attractive tools for investigating the properties of biological molecules via the understanding of molecular functionality.Among these technologies, nanopore sensing has become one of the growing technologies [1,2].Nanopore sensing operates in the principle of resistive pulse sensing, where sensing molecules, such as DNA, RNA, and protein, pass through a pore under the electrical field, resulting in a blockade current due to the molecular occupation in a pore.The physical properties of sensing entities were obtained by analyzing blockade current, which can provide a fingerprint of sensing molecules (Figure 1) [3].In this commentary article, we review the eight presentations at the symposium "Innovative label-free nanopore sensing toward biophysical studies and applications" of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Biophysical Society of Japan held in September 2022 and introduce how this sensing technology can be used as a tool to open new biophysical science or applications other than DNA sequencing.Kyle Briggs at Ottawa University/ Northern Nanopore Instruments talked about an automated method of electricalbased nanopore fabrication, which is one of the gold standard fabrication methods in the lab, and introduced how to accelerate solid-state nanopore research using this method [4,5].He also presented the automated muti-pore fabrication tools having multi-channels fluidic flow cells with multi-membrane chips.Finally, he showed the nanopore trace analysis software, Nanolyzer, which has multiple functions such as multi-level blockade current fitting, overlay translocation events, kernel density estimation, etc.Kan Shoji at Nagaoka University of Technology presented a probe-type planer bilayer lipid membrane (pBLM) system [6,7] and its application for scanning ion conductance microscopy (SICM) [8].In this system, pBLMs can be repeatedly formed at the tip of probes by inserting probes into a layered bath solution of an oil/lipid mixture and electrolyte.He mounted the probe into a SICM setup and demonstrated spatially-resolved chemical sensing by manipulating the probe.Additionally, he introduced an efficient current measurement system for synthetic DNA nanopores.Although DNA nanopore structures are expected to be applied for nanopore sensing, it is challenging to efficiently insert DNA nanopores into pBLMs.He prepared DNA nanopore-tethered gold electrodes and formed pBLMs on the surface of electrodes by inserting electrodes into the bath solution.Resultantly, efficient insertions of DNA nanopores were observed, and this method potentially accelerates applications of DNA nanopores for nanopore sensing.Figure 1 The fundamental working principle of nanopore sensing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it