Prediction of Angina Pectoris Events in Middle-Aged and Elderly People Using RR Interval Time Series in the Resting State: A Cohort Study Based on SHHS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Angina pectoris is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. In this study, a Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) prediction model with the Attention layer was established to explore the predictive value of the resting-state RR interval time series on the occurrence of angina pectoris. The data of this cohort study were from the Sleep Heart Health Study database, 2,977 people were included with the follow-up of 15 years. We used the RR interval time series of electrocardiogram signals in the resting state. The outcome variables were any angina events during the follow-up. We randomly divided 2,977 participants into training ( n = 2680) and testing sets ( n = 297) with a partition ratio of 9:1. The prediction model of Bi-LSTM with Attention layer was developed and the predictive performance was assessed. 1,236 had angina pectoris and 1,741 patients did not have angina pectoris during the follow-up period. The predictive performance of the Bi-LSTM model was great with the value of accuracy = 0.913, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.922, precision = 0.913 in the testing set. RR intervals may be the potential predictors of angina events. It is more and more convenient to obtain heart rate with the development of wearable devices; the Bi-LSTM prediction model established in this study is expected to provide support for the intelligent prediction of angina pectoris events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it