Efficacy of Antibiotic Eradication Therapy of Early <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Infection in Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale Chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) negatively impacts lung disease in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). There is currently limited evidence regarding the efficacy of PsA antibiotic eradication therapy (AET) in children with PCD. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of AET of early PsA infection in children with PCD. Methods This retrospective study included pediatric patients with a confirmed PCD diagnosis according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines at the Hospital for Sick Children between 2010 and 2022. Children with newly acquired PsA infection underwent AET using a stepwise protocol. The protocol included the following steps: step 1, 28 days of tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS); step 2, repeat TIS if culture positive after step 1; and step 3, 14 days of intravenous antibiotics followed by 28 days of TIS if culture positive after step 2. Step 3 was also used for patients who presented with pulmonary exacerbation symptoms. The main outcome was a PsA-negative culture result based on the microbiological results of the first culture after completion of each step of treatment. Results During the study period, 31 children had a new PsA infection and underwent AET. Of the 27 children who had been asymptomatic at the time of the PsA infection, negative PsA culture results were achieved in 20 (74%) of 27, 1 (14%) of 7, and 5 (83%) of 6 after steps 1, 2, and 3 of AET, respectively. All four symptomatic patients who initially were treated with step 3 had successful clearance of PsA. The overall cumulative success rate of the protocol for negative culture results after AET was 97% (30 of 31). For patients in whom AET was successful, the probability of staying PsA free for at least 1 year was 70%. Conclusions AET for early PsA infection is highly effective in PCD, with sustained efficacy in most individuals. These data suggest that AET should be considered in all children with PCD who have early PsA infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".