Microwave-Osmo-Dehydro-Freezing and Storage of Pineapple Titbits—Quality Advantage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osmotic dehydration is a pre-treatment given prior to finish drying or freezing preservation to improve quality and/or minimize the damaging effects on quality parameters, by partially reducing the moisture content of the sample. Pineapple titbits were partially dried using microwave assisted osmotic dehydration under continuous flow medium spray condition (MWODS) and then frozen with or without a sodium alginate–calcium chloride-based edible coating. The effects of MWODS pre-treatment and edible coating on the quality parameters of pineapple titbits frozen and stored at −20 °C for 10 and 50 days were evaluated after thawing. Both treatments (MWODS and alginate) resulted in superior quality products as compared to the control sample. MWODS, with its advantages over the conventional osmotic dehydration (COD) of rapid and higher moisture removal (16% in 10 min vs. 4 h in COD), while limiting solids gain (2.5% MWODS vs. 4.5% in COD), resulted in improved quality over the control during the frozen storage. The sodium alginate–calcium chloride edible coating treatment further reduced the drip loss in MW-osmo-dehydro-frozen pineapple titbits, possibly due to the effect of the calcium cross linked firming of the fruit texture. Both resulted in enhanced appearance, color and textural properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it