Bibliographic record
Abstract
Higher education has been one of the major concerns of the world. The construction of a world-class university in China has been one of the goals of the Chinese Communist Party. This paper focuses on a series of successive efforts and milestones made by the Chinese Communist Party government to build high-level universities from the founding of New China to the present. This study finds that the development of high-level universities is closely related to the construction and development of the state. Since the founding of New China, the Chinese Communist Party has begun to emphasize the construction of high-level universities. In order to cultivate the successors of socialism, high-level universities also began to reform and progress. By the time of reform and opening up, high-level universities began to focus on the modernization of education. Under the policy of strengthening the country with science and technology, “Project 211” and “Project 985” emerged one after another. They became very important projects to build China's world-class universities. Recently, the construction of double first-class universities has become the main goal of high-level university construction. The development of high-level universities is inseparable from the core values of the nation and the social context of China. However, at the same time, the development of high-level universities also needs to be integrated with the international context, and to exchange and learn from various nations around the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".