MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319601003 · doi:10.54097/ehss.v8i.4328

Manifestations and Treatment of Alcohol Addictive Behavior under Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

2023· article· en· W4319601003 on OpenAlexaff
Haoyang Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiopsychosocial modelAddictionContext (archaeology)PsychosocialPsychiatryAlcoholPsychologyMedicineAlcohol addiction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topic of alcohol addiction has been on the world's radar. Since the global outbreak of COVID-19, people worldwide have been affected by COVID-19 to varying degrees, including economically, in health, and in education. In the context of COVID-19, the psychosocial strain has caused an escalation in alcohol addiction and issues such as suicide, violence, and severe alcohol dependence, leading to increased attention to alcohol addiction. This paper aims to examine the reasons for the increase in alcohol addiction (both new and relapsed) and the generalization of treatment options (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for alcohol addiction in the context of COVID-19 through a biopsychosocial model. The mechanism of alcohol addiction involves different levels such as biological, psychological and social. This paper also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of popular online counseling in the context of the epidemic. For the individual, this paper may help enhance the future treatment of alcohol addiction to mitigate the harmful effects of alcohol addiction on the individual. This paper also provides a reference for research in related fields. More research into the treatment of alcohol addiction in the context of a large epidemic could help alleviate the suffering of patients in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.414
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207