Anogenital symptoms and lesions in a series of 20 patients infected with monkeypox virus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Monkeypox virus (MPXV) has been spreading in many European countries, the USA and Canada since May 2022. General symptoms, skin and anoperineal lesions have been reported. Anal pain is often reported, but anal canal lesions have yet to be described in these patients. The aim of this study was to describe anoperineal lesions in patients infected with MPXV undergoing systematic margin and anal canal examination at a tertiary care centre in France. METHOD: In this prospective descriptive study, systematic anal examination was performed in 20 patients diagnosed with MPXV infection at Bichat Hospital, Paris, France between 6 and 11 July 2022. Anal swabs were also obtained from all these patients for polymerase chain reaction testing for MPXV. RESULTS: All the patients were men that have sex with men (MSM). Sixteen patients had anal symptoms: 13 reported anal pain, and the other anal symptoms described were anal bleeding (n = 12), pruritus (n = 11), dyschezia (n = 10), tenesmus (n = 13), burning (n = 3), swelling (n = 9) and discharge of mucus (n = 9). Proctological examination detected: (i) anal margin lesions in 14 patients (vesicles, n = 8; pustules, n = 6; ulceration, n = 6); (ii) anal canal lesions in 16 patients (ulceration, n = 13; ulcers, n = 4; pustules, n = 1), seven of whom presented anal hypertonia; and (iii) rectal lesions in 12 patients (congested rectum, n = 6; erythema, n = 10; ulcers, n = 2; not seen in one case). the presence of mucus was noted in 10 patients and the presence of blood in six patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe anal canal lesions in patients infected with MPXV. Most of the observed lesions were ulceration, accounting for the pain reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".