MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319656667 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad017

Prospective Validation of the Lémann Index in Children: A Report From the Multicentre Image Kids Study

2023· article· en· W4319656667 on OpenAlexaff
Gili Focht, Ruth Cytter Kuint, Mary‐Louise C. Greer, Li‐tal Pratt, Denise Castro, Peter Church, Víctor Manuel Navas‐López, Robert N. Baldassano, Joachim Høg Mortensen, Florian Rieder, Baruch Yerushalmi, Anat Ilivitzki, Osnat Konen, Anne M. Griffiths, Dan Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationQueen's UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthAbbVie
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeReceiver operating characteristicConfidence intervalIntraclass correlationProspective cohort studyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineArea under the curveGastroenterologyCrohn's diseaseMann–Whitney U testNuclear medicineRadiologyDiseasePsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Lémann Index [LI] and the recently updated LI are tools for measuring structural bowel damage in adults with Crohn's disease [CD] but have not been evaluated in children. We aimed to validate the updated LI in the prospective multicentre ImageKids study of paediatric CD. METHODS: We included children with CD undergoing magnetic resonance enterography [MRE], pelvic magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and ileocolonoscopy. Half were followed for 18 months, when MRE was repeated. Serum was collected for fibrosis-related proteomic markers. The LI was calculated by central readers from the MRE, ileocolonoscopy, physical examination and surgical data. Reliability and construct validity were assessed at baseline, while responsiveness and test-retest reliability were explored longitudinally. RESULTS: In total, 240 children were included (mean age, 14.2 ± 2.5 years; median disease duration, 2.2 years [interquartile range, IQR 0.25-4.42]; median baseline LI, 4.23 [IQR 2.0-8.8]). The updated LI had excellent inter-observer reliability (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.95) but poor, although statistically significant, correlation with radiologist and gastroenterologist global assessments of damage and with serum proteomic levels of fibrotic markers [rho = 0.15-0.30, most p < 0.05]. The updated LI had low discriminative validity for detecting damage (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.75). In 116 repeated MREs, responsiveness was suboptimal for differentiating improved from unchanged disease [AUC-ROC 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.71]. Test-retest reliability was high among stable patients [ICC = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.91]. CONCLUSION: Overall, the updated LI had insufficient psychometric performance for recommending its use in children. An age-specific index may be needed for children with shorter disease duration than typical adult cohorts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207