MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319657006 · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7364

Assessment of Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Including Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease

2023· review· en· W4319657006 on OpenAlexaff
Alisha Sharma, Kathryn Corbett, Hany Soliman, Arjun Sahgal, Sunit Das, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Katarzyna J. Jerzak

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Oncology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialBreast cancerLung cancerDiseaseClinical trialMelanomaCancerInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This systematic review examines the proportion of patients with leptomeningeal disease included in phase 3 randomized clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.097
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.097
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.014
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.360
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA OncologySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207