MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319707239 · doi:10.1017/9781571137760.002

Introduction: In the Beginning

2011· other· en· W4319707239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN JANUARY 1924, HEMINGWAY — himself twenty-four, seven months older than the century — sailed back to France from a stint as journalist for the Toronto Star, determined to quit reporting in order to concentrate on his fiction writing. He was serving as a Red Cross volunteer in Italy when he was wounded in the First World War two weeks before his nineteenth birthday by the explosion of a trench mortar shell; thus he knew the war without ever having been a soldier in it. Now, with no regular job, he and his wife Hadley, together with their son Jack (nicknamed Bumby), would live on the income from her trust fund and on whatever else Hemingway could make by selling poems or stories, a very limited market. At this time he was the author of two small pamphlets printed in fewer than 300 copies each: Three Stories and Ten Poems , 64 pages, published by Robert McAlmon in 1923, and in our time , 30 pages, finally handset and published by Bill Bird in March of 1924 (of the three-hundred-copy print run only 170 arrived from the printer intact; neither pamphlet sold out in the first year of publication). This first in our time (note lower-case title) consisted of sixteen two- and three-paragraph narratives that would become the numbered interchapters of 1925’s more substantial In Our Time. In February of 1925 Hemingway received a cable from the publishers Boni and Liveright in New York offering a contract for his short-story collection, as well as a contract offer from his future publisher Scribners that arrived after he had accepted Liveright’s offer; by this time Hemingway already had a substantial reputation. He was well known in Paris’s English-language literary circles, in part based on his charisma and enthusiastic self-confidence. He worked as assistant editor to Ford Madox Ford on the transatlantic review , and when that folded, helped editors Ernest Walsh and Ethel Moorhead with their This Quarter ; both journals published his fiction and paid him for it. Poet Archibald MacLeish, later Librarian of Congress and Assistant Secretary of State, who met Hemingway in 1924, said of him, “The only [other] person I have ever known who could exhaust the oxygen in a room the way Ernest could was Franklin Delano Roosevelt.” Eugene Jolas, in a November 1924 column for the Paris edition of the Chicago Tribune, wrote, “Dear Hemingway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2830.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207