MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319733200 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnac369

On a Conjecture of Bitoun and Schedler

2023· article· en· W4319733200 on OpenAlexaff
Mircea Mustaţă, Sebastián Olano

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHypersurfaceConjectureCombinatoricsMultiplicity (mathematics)Dimension (graph theory)Gravitational singularityIdeal (ethics)HomogeneousAlgebraic numberPolynomialPure mathematicsGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Suppose that $X$ is a smooth complex algebraic variety of dimension $\geq 3$ and $f$ defines a hypersurface $Z$ in $X$, with a unique singular point $P$. Bitoun and Schedler conjectured that the ${\mathcal {D}}$-module generated by $\tfrac {1}{f}$ has length equal to $g_{P}(Z)+2$, where $g_{P}(Z)$ is the reduced genus of $Z$ at $P$. We prove that this length is always $\geq g_{P}(Z)+2$ and equality holds if and only if $\tfrac {1}{f}$ lies in the ${\mathcal {D}}$-module generated by $I_{0}(f)\tfrac {1}{f}$, where $I_{0}(f)$ is the multiplier ideal ${\mathcal {J}}(f^{1-\epsilon })$, with $0<\epsilon \ll 1$. In particular, we see that the conjecture holds if the pair $(X,Z)$ is log canonical. We can also recover, with an easy proof, the result of Bitoun and Schedler saying that the conjecture holds for weighted homogeneous isolated singularities. On the other hand, we give an example (a polynomial in $3$ variables with an ordinary singular point of multiplicity $4$) for which the conjecture does not hold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207