MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Drone Assisted Forest Structural Classification of Kejimkujik National Park using Deep Learning

2022· article· en· W4319777878 on OpenAlexaff
Sutirtha Roy, Sarosij Bose, Karen A. Harper, Vaibhav Jaiswal, Manu Bansal

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational parkBiodiversityDroneComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningNational forestTransfer of learningDiversity (politics)Forest structureGeographyMachine learningEcologyForestryCanopyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wide array of terrestrial forest and wooded lands is one of the richest sources of biodiversity because of inherent structural diversity. Structure plays a significant role in a diversity indicator of a forest. We propose a transfer learning framework consisting of the ResNet-50 architecture for which we obtained a test accuracy of 75.86%. Analysis of structural diversity of the Kejimkujik National Park was done with the help of a drone using deep learning methods that predict the structural class of the forest. We used a novel forest structural diversity dataset collected using DJI Mavic drone to train the deep learning model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS)Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207