Mindfulness through agency in health consumption: Empirical evidence from committed dietary supplement consumers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Due to individuals' increasing demand for health promotion, various health‐related consumer goods, like dietary supplements (DS), have flourished in the marketplace as magical solutions to consumers' life problems. Inevitably influenced by various marketplace stakeholders and information sources such as family, friends, brands, and social media influencers, consumers may encounter difficulties making well‐informed health decisions. Based on empirical evidence gleaned from in‐depth interviews with DS consumers, this research contributes to consumer wellness and health promotion research by confirming the role of mindfulness as an agency in distancing individuals from external social noises and enabling them to respond flexibly to inner experiences and desires. We contribute to mindful consumption research by identifying the positive impact of mindfulness on facilitating conscious and independent DS consumption decisions and health practices. Moreover, the daily practices that enable individuals to accumulate mindfulness and the impact of mindfulness on females' perception of beauty are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it