Les collections préhistoriques au musée d’Archéologie nationale : le cas de la grotte d’Isturitz (Pyrénées-Atlantiques)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le musée d’Archéologie nationale abrite d’importantes collections paléolithiques mises au jour, pour une grande partie d’entre elles, pendant la première moitié du xxe siècle, voire à la fin du xixe. C’est le cas du mobilier provenant de la grotte d’Isturitz, en Pays basque, constitué par Emmanuel Passemard, il y a près de cent ans, puis par Suzanne et René de Saint-Périer, quelques décennies plus tard. L’historique de ces collections, de leur découverte à leur diffusion auprès de tous les publics, en passant par leur acquisition, conservation et présentation, illustre parfaitement le potentiel que revêtent encore de nos jours les séries préhistoriques majeures issues de fouilles archéologiques anciennes. Bien qu’elles soient réputées poser des difficultés contextuelles et stratigraphiques, elles peuvent faire l’objet d’une étude historiographique et archéologique, afin de parvenir à une relecture des occupations, critique et constructive, toujours riche d’enseignements scientifiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".