MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Study of the Characteristics of the Induced Geoelectric Field of Geomagnetic Storms in March 1989

2022· article· en· W4319978510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yilin Yang, Zezhong Wang, Lianguang Liu

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 9th International Forum on Electrical Engineering and Automation (IFEEA) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth's magnetic fieldGeomagnetic stormGeologyGeomagnetically induced currentStormGeophysicsClimatologyMeteorologyMagnetic fieldGeographyOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On March 13, 1989, the geomagnetic field disturbance (GMD) of an intense geomagnetic storm caused a power blackout in Canada. It is necessary to study whether the induced geoelectric field by similar GMD would have a serious impact on the low-latitude grid. In this paper, the GMD data of the geomagnetic storm on March 13,1989 at Beijing Geomagnetic Station are converted into digital data, and the magnetotelluric (MT) sounding data of the east of Mongolia are used to calculate the induced geoelectric field by the GMD using the plane wave theory. Characteristics of amplitude and variation of the induced geoelectric field by the geomagnetic storm on March 13, 1989 are studied. The results show that the geomagnetic storm on March 13, 1989 can produce the induced geoelectric field with the maximum value of 1.65 V / km in eastern Mongolia, and the maximum geoelectric field appears in the initial phase of the geomagnetic storm. This conclusion is of great significance to understand the harm of the geomagnetic storm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 9th International Forum on Electrical Engineering and Automation (IFEEA)Same topicEarthquake Detection and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207