Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & PhotomedicineVolume 39, Issue 2 p. 181-181 CORRIGENDUMFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Photopatch test results of the North American contact dermatitis group, 1999-2009 Vincent A. DeLeo, Brandon L. Adler, Erin M. Warshaw, Howard I. Maibach, Donald V. Belsito, Joseph F. Fowler, Anthony F. Fransway, James G. Marks, C. G. Toby Mathias, Melanie D. Pratt, Robert L. Rietschel, Frances J. Storrs, Kathryn A. Zug, Denis Sasseville, Volume 38Issue 3Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine pages: 288-291 First Published online: October 25, 2021 First published: 09 February 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12859AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In DeLeo (2022),1 there were errors in the authorship and affiliations. 1. One of the authors was not included in the published article and should be added. The details of the missing author is given below: James S. Taylor, MD, Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, email id: [email protected] The updated list of authors along with an updated conflict of interest declaration in bold is given below. Vincent A. DeLeo, Brandon L. Adler, Erin M. Warshaw, Howard I. Maibach, Donald V. Belsito, Joseph F. Fowler Jr, Anthony F. Fransway, James G. Marks Jr, C. G. Toby Mathias, Melanie D. Pratt, Robert L. Rietschel, Frances J. Storrs, Kathryn A. Zug, Denis Sasseville, James S. Taylor CONFLICT OF INTEREST B.L.A. has served as an investigator for AbbVie and as a consultant for Skin Research Institute, LLC. E.M.W. has received an investigator-initiated grant from Wen by Chaz Dean and served as a consultant for Wen by Chaz Dean and Noven Pharmaceuticals. D.S. receives royalties from UpToDate (Wolters Kluwer Health). J.S.T. owns non-controlling common shares of stock in Astra Zeneca, Cigna, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and Opko Health. He has consulted for Kao Brands and Monsanto (Bayer), is a member of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Steering Committee, and has a non-dependent child employed by Pfizer. The other authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare. 2. The affiliation of the author, Denis Sasseville was incorrect and should be changed from Division of Dermatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada to Division of Dermatology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The authors apologize for the error. REFERENCE 1DeLeo VA, Adler BL, Warshaw EM, et al. Photopatch test results of the north American contact dermatitis group, 1999–2009. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022; 38: 288- 291. doi:10.1111/phpp.12742 Volume39, Issue2March 2023Pages 181-181 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".