A 16.5-31 GHz Area-Efficient Tapered Tunable Transmission Line Phase Shifter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a Tapered Tunable Transmission Line (Tapered TTL) phase shifter that achieves a higher area efficiency than conventional Tunable Transmission Line (TTL) phase shifters while maintaining the same phase shift range with similar insertion losses. A systematic methodology is provided for the optimum design of the proposed phase shifter to maximize its area efficiency while providing the desired phase shift range and satisfying the maximum allowed input/output return and insertion losses. To verify the efficacy of the proposed solution, an eleven-cell phase shifter is fabricated in a standard 65-nm Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor (CMOS) technology and the measurement results are reported. The fabricated circuit provides a 180-degree phase shift over the frequency range of 16.5 to 31 GHz with an average insertion loss of 7.2 dB. The proposed design presents a 25 percent reduction in the chip area per unit delay in comparison to the conventional design with the same average insertion loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".