Real-Time Mitigation of Measurement Noise Arising From Geomagnetic Background Interferences for a Coil Vector Magnetometer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the existing coil vector magnetometers, the negative effect of the geomagnetic background interference generated by solar activity has hardly been considered, making it difficult to further improve the solution precision for the magnetic direction. To address this issue, we propose a novel method of mitigating the measurement noise arising from the geomagnetic background interference. We combine the total field with the synchronous component data of the three-axis fluxgate magnetic sensor to correct the resultant field after applying a bias field in real time, and then propose a new measurement algorithm of magnetic inclination and declination to reduce noise. In theoretical evaluation, we model the measurement noise and then verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Moreover, we build a dedicated experimental platform to verify the practicality of the proposed method. Comparative observation results obtained in a nonmagnetic room of a geomagnetic observatory show that the proposed method significantly mitigates the measurement noise of the magnetic inclination and declination by 83% and 75%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".