Impact of thickness, void content, temperature and loading rate on tensile fracture toughness and work of fracture of asphalt mixtures- An experimental study using the SCB test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asphaltic concrete mixtures are among the most common construction materials for the pavement of roads. As a multi-phase composite mixture with randomly distributed aggregates inside the mastic part, the mechanical properties of such materials can be influenced by different factors. Cracking and induced fracture is among the common degradation and failure modes in these construction mixtures that often takes place in cold regions. In this research, the effects of some influencing parameters including temperature, air void percentage and loading rate are investigated experimentally on the fracture toughness (KIc) and work of fracture (WIc) of hot mix asphalt material. Edge notched semi-circular bend (SCB) specimen was employed to conduct mode I fracture experiments. The thickness of SCB samples were considered as variable and the HMA mixtures were tested with two SCB thicknesses of 30 and 60 mm. The experimental results showed that both fracture toughness and fracture work are increased by increasing the thickness. However, the effect of thickness on the fracture work was much more significant than the KIc value. Also, the fracture and cracking resistance parameters were increased by decreasing the temperature and air void content. Both KIc and WIc values were also increased by increasing the loading rate in the investigated range of 1 to 8 mm/min. The most influencing parameters on the change of fracture resistance parameters were the temperature, loading rate, air void content and thickness, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".