MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DSFL: Dynamic Sparsification for Federated Learning

2022· article· en· W4320011078 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdi Beitollahi, Mingrui Liu, Ning Lu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBottleneckInformation bottleneck methodKey (lock)Similarity (geometry)Kernel (algebra)Theoretical computer scienceFederated learningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningDistributed computingImage (mathematics)Cluster analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated Learning (FL) is considered the key, enabling approach for privacy-preserving, distributed machine learning (ML) systems. FL requires the periodic transmission of ML models from users to the server. Therefore, communication via resource-constrained networks is currently a fundamental bottleneck in FL, which is restricting the ML model complexity and user participation. One of the notable trends to reduce the communication cost of FL systems is gradient compression, in which techniques in the form of sparsification are utilized. However, these methods utilize a single compression rate for all users and do not consider communication heterogeneity in a real-world FL system. Therefore, these methods are bottlenecked by the worst communication capacity across users. Further, sparsification methods are non-adaptive and do not utilize the redundant, similar information across users' ML models for compression. In this paper, we introduce a novel Dynamic Sparsification for Federated Learning (DSFL) approach that enables users to compress their local models based on their communication capacity at each iteration by using two novel sparsification methods: layer-wise similarity sparsification (LSS) and extended top- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K$</tex> sparsification. LSS enables DSFL to utilize the global redundant information in users' models by using the Centralized Kernel Alignment (CKA) similarity for sparsification. The extended top- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K$</tex> model sparsification method empowers DSFL to accommodate the heterogeneous communication capacity of user devices by allowing different values of sparsification rate <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K$</tex> for each user at each iteration. Our extensive experimental results <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> All code and experiments are publicly available at: https://github.com/mahdibeit/DSFL. on three datasets show that DSFL has a faster convergence rate than fixed sparsification, and as the communication heterogeneity increases, this gap increases. Further, our thorough experimental investigations uncover the similarities of user models across the FL system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0130.045
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207