DSFL: Dynamic Sparsification for Federated Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is considered the key, enabling approach for privacy-preserving, distributed machine learning (ML) systems. FL requires the periodic transmission of ML models from users to the server. Therefore, communication via resource-constrained networks is currently a fundamental bottleneck in FL, which is restricting the ML model complexity and user participation. One of the notable trends to reduce the communication cost of FL systems is gradient compression, in which techniques in the form of sparsification are utilized. However, these methods utilize a single compression rate for all users and do not consider communication heterogeneity in a real-world FL system. Therefore, these methods are bottlenecked by the worst communication capacity across users. Further, sparsification methods are non-adaptive and do not utilize the redundant, similar information across users' ML models for compression. In this paper, we introduce a novel Dynamic Sparsification for Federated Learning (DSFL) approach that enables users to compress their local models based on their communication capacity at each iteration by using two novel sparsification methods: layer-wise similarity sparsification (LSS) and extended top- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K$</tex> sparsification. LSS enables DSFL to utilize the global redundant information in users' models by using the Centralized Kernel Alignment (CKA) similarity for sparsification. The extended top- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K$</tex> model sparsification method empowers DSFL to accommodate the heterogeneous communication capacity of user devices by allowing different values of sparsification rate <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K$</tex> for each user at each iteration. Our extensive experimental results <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> All code and experiments are publicly available at: https://github.com/mahdibeit/DSFL. on three datasets show that DSFL has a faster convergence rate than fixed sparsification, and as the communication heterogeneity increases, this gap increases. Further, our thorough experimental investigations uncover the similarities of user models across the FL system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.013 | 0.045 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".