Micromorphology of epicuticular waxes in genus Mimosa (Fabaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epicuticular waxes crystallize on the foliar surface with different morphologies, which can be taxonomically relevant features in many taxa. Their morphological analysis was based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images on herbarium specimens of selected sections of Mimosa. The present work is the first detailed description and classification of the epidermal micromorphology in the genus Mimosa, focusing on section Calothamnos and Mimosa series Mimosa, subseries Dolentes and Brevipedes. We also describe different wax crystallization morphologies present in these taxa, identifying three different crystallization types: film, plates, and platelets. Novel epidermal micromorphologies have been described, such as papillae in M. lepidorepens. Results allow grouping taxa of the studied sections, contributing to clarifying their taxonomy. SEM images of epicuticular waxes and leaf surfaces could be a new tool for performing a new taxonomic treatment of section Mimosa subser. Dolentes and subser. Brevipedes, and section Calothamnos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".