MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320020171 · doi:10.20961/shes.v5i4.69045

Knowing the innovation of healthy rice in the cultivation of healthy rice farming in Rejo Asri Village, Seputih Raman District, Central Lampung Regency

2022· article· id· W4320020171 on OpenAlexaff
Serly Silviyanti, Indah Nurmayasari, Saskia Susanti Haros, Risa Rahmadhanti

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Humanities and Educational Studies (SHEs) Conference Series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorticultureAgricultural scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pemerintah merekomendasikan budidaya tanaman sehat yang berjalan tanpa adanya kendala/ permasalahan. Petani menghadapi permasalahan umum dalam budidaya tanaman sehat ini salah satunya adalah harga. Label sehat pada produk ini menjadikan label harga yang cukup tinggi. Petani padi sehat di Desa Rejo Asri melaksanakan usahatani padi sehat dengan banyak tantangan. Tantangan tersebut mulai dari jumlah produksi padi konvensional yang masih lebih banyak daripada padi sehat. Tujuan penelitian ini mengetahui Bagaimana inovasi padi sehat dalam budidaya usahatani padi sehat di Desa Rejo Asri Kecamatan Seputih Raman Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Desa Rejo Asri Kecamatan Seputih Raman Kabupaten Lampung dengan responden sebanyak 50 petani padi sehat. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan. Hasil penelitian inovasi padi sehat menguntungkan petani dari segi ekonomi. Inovasi padi sehat sesuai dengan nilai sosial budaya, kebutuhan, dan pengalaman masa lalu. Petani mudah melakukan, mencoba, dan mengamati hasil budidaya padi sehat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Humanities and Educational Studies (SHEs) Conference SeriesSame topicAgricultural Development and ManagementFrench-language works237,207