MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320028946 · doi:10.1093/ahr/rhac372

Martha Hanna. <i>Anxious Days and Tearful Nights: Canadian War Wives during the Great War</i>.

2022· article· en· W4320028946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Warren Breckman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeHistorySpanish Civil WarFaithPortraitGender studiesWorld War IIMilitary servicePsychologySociologyDemographyPolitical scienceLawArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The great World War I conscript armies of continental Europe required married men to serve. In Great Britain, conscription was introduced in 1916, and in the course of that year expanded from unmarried to married men. Canadian conscription, imposed in 1917, began with unmarried men but the war ended before married men were forced into service. Almost all the married men who served in the Canadian Expeditionary Force were volunteers, and they enlisted in droves. The wives and children they left behind have received relatively little attention, but they find their historian in Martha Hanna. Offering what she calls a “composite portrait of Canada’s war wives,” Hanna’s book makes for illuminating and at times heartbreaking reading as it tracks the trials and tribulations of women coping with anxiety about their husbands’ safety even as they struggled to make ends meet and raise children alone. Given that Canada’s married soldiers were mostly volunteers, Hanna begins Anxious Days and Tearful Nights by inverting a familiar recruitment slogan to ask, “Daddy, why did you go to war?” Volunteers were frequently British-born immigrants who saw enlistment as patriotic support for the homeland. Some saw the war in idealistic terms, while others sought to escape unhappy marriages. Many were motivated by the desire to boost their family’s income, especially in the war’s first year, when an economic recession that began in 1913 kept many people in straitened circumstances. Enlistment ensured that a man’s wife received a monthly Separation Allowance of roughly $20 funded by the federal government. A soldier could opt to assign a portion of his pay to go directly to his family, and wives received supplemental support from the Canadian Patriotic Fund, a private organization dependent on donations that Hanna asserts was unique among belligerent nations. By Hanna’s calculation, the average Canadian war wife had between $50 and $60 per month; it was a meager sum, especially as the cost of living rose by late 1916.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0280.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207